<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Arizona Corporate Law</title>
	<atom:link href="http://azcorporatelaw.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://azcorporatelaw.com</link>
	<description>Your Resource for Developments in Business, Finance and Real Estate Law in Arizona</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 15:00:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Slow Economic Recovery Continues</title>
		<link>http://azcorporatelaw.com/uncategorized/slow-economic-recovery-continues/</link>
		<comments>http://azcorporatelaw.com/uncategorized/slow-economic-recovery-continues/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 15:00:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Thrasher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://azcorporatelaw.com/?p=501</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some good news from Wells Fargo in their recent Economic Outlook. The economy is slowly but surely continuing to improve: Wells Fargo February 2012 Economic Outlook.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some good news from Wells Fargo in their recent Economic Outlook. The economy is slowly but surely continuing to improve: <a href="http://azcorporatelaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/WEFC_021020121.pdf">Wells Fargo February 2012 Economic Outlook</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://azcorporatelaw.com/uncategorized/slow-economic-recovery-continues/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fiduciary Duties of Delaware LLC Managers</title>
		<link>http://azcorporatelaw.com/entity-formation/fiduciary-duties-of-delaware-llc-managers/</link>
		<comments>http://azcorporatelaw.com/entity-formation/fiduciary-duties-of-delaware-llc-managers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 18:57:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Thrasher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entity Formation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://azcorporatelaw.com/?p=498</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A recent opinion from the Delaware Court of Chancery is an important read for managers of Delaware LLCs and their counsel. In Auriga Capital Corp. et al v. Gatz Properties, LLC et al, C.A. 4390-CS (Del. Ch. Jan. 27, 2012) the court held that managers of Delaware LLCs owe fiduciary duties of care and loyalty [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A recent opinion from the Delaware Court of Chancery is an important read for managers of Delaware LLCs and their counsel. In <em>Auriga Capital Corp. et al v. Gatz Properties, LLC et al, C.A. 4390-CS (Del. Ch. Jan. 27, 2012)</em> the court held that managers of Delaware LLCs owe fiduciary duties of care and loyalty to minority members unless those duties are expressly waived or amended in the Operating Agreement.</p>
<p>Fiduciary duties of LLC managers is an important matter, as many Operating Agreements are silent on the issue. Such silence will now result in fiduciary duties being imputed to the LLC manager(s). Although fiduciary duties will now apply to LLC managers, the court acknowledged that parties to the Operating Agreement are free to modify or eliminate such duties. Attorneys drafting Operating Agreements for Delaware LLCs should discuss with their clients the advantages and disadvantages of modifying or eliminating the fiduciary duties owed by the LLC manager(s). If the parties desire to completely eliminate such duties, the court advised specifically stating in the Operating Agreement that “The only duties owed by the Manager are set forth in the Agreement.”</p>
<p>Although the court’s ruling does not effect LLCs in other jurisdictions, other state courts often look to Delaware in corporate law matters, and may opt to follow Delaware’s lead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://azcorporatelaw.com/entity-formation/fiduciary-duties-of-delaware-llc-managers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Report on Housing Recovery and Homeownership</title>
		<link>http://azcorporatelaw.com/real-estate/report-on-housing-recovery-and-homeownership/</link>
		<comments>http://azcorporatelaw.com/real-estate/report-on-housing-recovery-and-homeownership/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:00:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Thrasher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Real Estate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://azcorporatelaw.com/?p=491</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wells Fargo has released its report on the housing recover, vacancy rates and homeownership: Wells Fargo Housing Report Jan 2012.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wells Fargo has released its report on the housing recover, vacancy rates and homeownership: <a href="http://azcorporatelaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/HousingVacancyNormalization_01192012.pdf">Wells Fargo Housing Report Jan 2012</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://azcorporatelaw.com/real-estate/report-on-housing-recovery-and-homeownership/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Common Employment Mistakes Made By New Companies</title>
		<link>http://azcorporatelaw.com/start-ups/common-employment-mistakes-for-new-companies/</link>
		<comments>http://azcorporatelaw.com/start-ups/common-employment-mistakes-for-new-companies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 15:00:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Thrasher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Start-Ups]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://azcorporatelaw.com/?p=442</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Preserving capital and reducing expenses are priorities for most startups. However, when it comes to compensating employees startups need to be careful of how they try to save money. Inadvertently running afoul of various employment laws can cause a startup to incur significant regulatory penalties, litigation expenses, and increased taxes. The first employees of a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Preserving capital and reducing expenses are priorities for most startups. However, when it comes to compensating employees startups need to be careful of how they try to save money. Inadvertently running afoul of various employment laws can cause a startup to incur significant regulatory penalties, litigation expenses, and increased taxes.</p>
<p>The first employees of a company are generally the founders, or others with a significant personal interest in the company. To conserve capital, these individuals sometimes forgo salary or other cash compensation for the work they are performing, or make arrangements to receive equity or be paid at a later date. Unfortunately, arrangements of this nature often violate state wage and hour laws. In the event that a founder or early employee departs the company on bad terms, the startup could find itself the target of an investigation by state regulators and tax authorities.<span id="more-442"></span></p>
<p>An employee could claim he or she was underpaid or not paid at all, and could sue to seek reimbursement for unpaid wages and overtime, plus fines, interest and attorneys&#8217; fees. In general, all employees of a company must be paid cash compensation on regularly scheduled paydays, and such compensation must at least meet the applicable minimum wage for every hour worked. Employers should be sure they understand all applicable wage and hour requirements, as well as applicable minimum wage laws. A company can always offer equity awards or deferred compensation to enhance an employee&#8217;s compensation package, but such perks can not replace the minimum wage per hour worked.</p>
<p>Another common employment mistake is to classify all employees as &#8220;exempt&#8221; employees. This is a common occurrence because startups are often seeking ways to simplify the payroll process and have fixed costs for employees. However, paying an employee a fixed salary does not necessarily eliminate the company&#8217;s obligation to monitor the employee’s work hours and pay additional wages for overtime. Payment of a salary is only one part of the test for determining whether an employee is exempt from the overtime requirement. An employer must also analyze the employees position and duties to determine if they fit within the overtime exemption. Failure to properly classify an employee may give rise to claims for unpaid overtime going back up to 4 years.</p>
<p>The other common employment mistake involves misclassification of a different sort, misclassifying employees as independent contractors. <a title="Proper Classification of Independent Contractors" href="http://azcorporatelaw.com/employment/proper-classification-of-employee-vs-independent-contractor/" target="_blank">I have written about this topic before</a>. To briefly summarize, employers must be aware of the 6-factor &#8220;economic reality test&#8221; for determining whether a worker is an employee or an independent contractor. Failure to properly classify a worker as an employee can create liability for unpaid wages, overtime, and failure to withhold and pay employment taxes. <a title="IRS Focuses on Worker Misclassification" href="http://azcorporatelaw.com/employment/irs-focuses-on-worker-misclassification/" target="_blank">Tax authorities are focusing on worker misclassification</a>, and companies must proceed with caution when determining independent contractor status.</p>
<p>Startups should take the time to consult with an experienced attorney to develop employment policies that can minimize the risk of serious litigation, fines and penalties in the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://azcorporatelaw.com/start-ups/common-employment-mistakes-for-new-companies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Phoenix Foreclosures, Home Prices Both Decline</title>
		<link>http://azcorporatelaw.com/real-estate/phoenix-foreclosures-home-prices-both-decline/</link>
		<comments>http://azcorporatelaw.com/real-estate/phoenix-foreclosures-home-prices-both-decline/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 15:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Thrasher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Real Estate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://azcorporatelaw.com/?p=475</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to a study conducted by Arizona State University, Phoenix-area foreclosures declined 16% in 2011, but home prices declined substantially as well. There were 35,855 foreclosures in Phoenix, down from 41,625 in 2010. While that is welcome news, homeowners staying in their homes are continuing to see values decline. The median sales price for a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to a study conducted by Arizona State University, Phoenix-area foreclosures declined 16% in 2011, but home prices declined substantially as well. There were 35,855 foreclosures in Phoenix, down from 41,625 in 2010. While that is welcome news, homeowners staying in their homes are continuing to see values decline. The median sales price for a single-family home dipped to $125,000 in 2011, down 10.4% from 2010. The median price for multi-family units also declined more than 10% from 2010.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://azcorporatelaw.com/real-estate/phoenix-foreclosures-home-prices-both-decline/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Announces Extension of HAMP</title>
		<link>http://azcorporatelaw.com/real-estate/obama-announces-extension-of-hamp/</link>
		<comments>http://azcorporatelaw.com/real-estate/obama-announces-extension-of-hamp/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 15:00:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Thrasher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Real Estate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://azcorporatelaw.com/?p=487</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Obama administration announced that it will extend the Home Affordable Modification Program for an additional year, and also increase payments to banks in an effort to get them to modify more troubled loans. HAMP was set to expire at the end of this year, but will now be extended until the end of 2013. HAMP&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Obama administration announced that it will extend the Home Affordable Modification Program for an additional year, and also increase payments to banks in an effort to get them to modify more troubled loans. HAMP was set to expire at the end of this year, but will now be extended until the end of 2013. HAMP&#8217;s original purpose was to enable borrower&#8217;s to reduce their monthly payments by extending the term of their loan and/or lowering the interest rate. Now, however, the focus is more on pushing banks to reduce outstanding loan balances.</p>
<p>When the Obama administration announced HAMP 3 years ago, it initially estimated that 3 to 4 million homeowners could receive assistance under the program. However, only about 750,000 homeowners have been able to permanently reduce their mortgage payments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://azcorporatelaw.com/real-estate/obama-announces-extension-of-hamp/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Arizona Non-Judicial Foreclosure Process (a/k/a Trustee&#8217;s Sale)</title>
		<link>http://azcorporatelaw.com/real-estate/arizona-non-judicial-foreclosure-process-aka-trustees-sale/</link>
		<comments>http://azcorporatelaw.com/real-estate/arizona-non-judicial-foreclosure-process-aka-trustees-sale/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 15:00:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Thrasher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Real Estate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://azcorporatelaw.com/?p=437</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I recently posted some information for homeowners who are considering a short sale, deed-in-lieu or foreclosure as a way to get out of an underwater property. As I explained in my post, when it comes to foreclosure there can be different processes for foreclosing, either a &#8220;judicial foreclosure&#8221; or a &#8220;non-judicial foreclosure,&#8221; which is more [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently posted some information for homeowners who are considering a short sale, deed-in-lieu or foreclosure as a way to get out of an underwater property. As I explained in my post, when it comes to foreclosure there can be different processes for foreclosing, either a &#8220;judicial foreclosure&#8221; or a &#8220;non-judicial foreclosure,&#8221; which is more commonly known as a &#8220;trustee&#8217;s sale.&#8221; Since judicial foreclosures are uncommon in Arizona, I am focusing this post on the process for non-judicial foreclosure (trustee&#8217;s sale).<span id="more-437"></span></p>
<ol>
<li>A borrower must be at least 31 days behind in payments before a lender can direct the trustee to record a notice of default/sale (Notice).  However, the lender can direct the trustee to record the Notice anytime after the 31 day period, and most lenders attempt their own internal loss mitigation process before the Notice is recorded.</li>
<li>Within 5 days of recording the Notice the trustee will mail (certified or registered) a copy of the Notice to the borrower.</li>
<li>An additional Notice will be sent to all parties with a recorded interest in the property within 30 days of recording the Notice.</li>
<li>The trustee will publish the Notice as required by statute.</li>
<li>At least 20 days before the date of the trustee’s sale (listed in the Notice) the trustee must post notice of the sale of the property in a public place (Superior Court) that is permissible under the statute.</li>
<li>Before 5:00 p.m. on the last day (other than a Saturday or legal holiday) before the date of the trustee&#8217;s sale the borrower can pay all amounts due and reinstate the loan and maintain title to the property.</li>
<li>If not reinstated, the property will be sold on the sale date contained in the Notice.</li>
<li>Once the property is sold at the trustee’s sale the borrower will receive (as required by statute) a notice from the new property owner that the property has been purchased and that the borrower is required to vacate the property within 5 days.</li>
<li>If the borrower fails to vacate, an eviction action can, and likely will, be filed seeking possession of the property, reasonable rent, costs, and fees.</li>
</ol>
<p>A homeowner facing foreclosure is encouraged to consult with an experienced attorney for more detailed information regarding the foreclosure process, and the homeowners various rights and obligations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://azcorporatelaw.com/real-estate/arizona-non-judicial-foreclosure-process-aka-trustees-sale/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Short-Sale, Foreclosure and Anti-Deficiency Information</title>
		<link>http://azcorporatelaw.com/real-estate/short-sale-foreclosure-and-anti-deficiency-information/</link>
		<comments>http://azcorporatelaw.com/real-estate/short-sale-foreclosure-and-anti-deficiency-information/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 15:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Thrasher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Real Estate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://azcorporatelaw.com/?p=433</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I frequently receive inquiries from homeowners with underwater properties who want to know about their options. A short sale, deed-in-lieu or foreclosure are the 3 most common options for disposing of an underwater property. Each option is a unique process with its own set of challenges. Below is some general information about each, along with [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I frequently receive inquiries from homeowners with underwater properties who want to know about their options. A short sale, deed-in-lieu or foreclosure are the 3 most common options for disposing of an underwater property. Each option is a unique process with its own set of challenges. Below is some general information about each, along with some other answers to common questions.<span id="more-433"></span></p>
<p><strong><em>Short Sale</em></strong></p>
<p>A short sale is a sale of real estate in which the proceeds from the sale amount to less than the total amount owed on the property. Although a short sale is like any other sale of real property (i.e., between a buyer and seller), because the lender is in effect “writing off” a portion of the loan on the property, approval of the sale by the lender is required. A short sale can be a superior option compared to a foreclosure for both the lender and borrower. The lender can avoid fees and expenses associated with a foreclosure, and may also be able to sell the house more quickly. Although the borrower’s credit report will reflect a short sale, it will not have as negative of an impact as a foreclosure. Borrowers who short sell their property might even be able to purchase another home more quickly than if they had gone through a foreclosure, typically about 2-3 years after the short sale.</p>
<p><strong><em>Deed-in-Lieu</em></strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>A deed-in-lieu is another alternative that a borrower can take in order to avoid foreclosure. This alternative deeds the property back to the lender, in exchange for a release of all commitments as stated in the mortgage contract. This option can save time and money compared to a foreclosure. There could also be the possibility of the borrower leasing the property back from the lender and remaining in the home.</p>
<p><strong><em>Foreclosure</em></strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>If a borrower is unable to short sell a property, or deed the property back to the lender, a foreclosure is typically the final option. Depending on the terms of the mortgage and/or deed of trust on the property, the lender can take control of the property and sell the property. The deficiency of the mortgage payments by the borrower will be reflected in the borrower’s credit report. A borrower desiring to purchase another home after going through a foreclosure must typically wait anywhere from 5-7 years after the foreclosure.</p>
<p><strong><em>Effects on Borrowers</em></strong></p>
<p>Although a short sale will be reflected on a borrower’s credit report, a foreclosure will be the most detrimental to the borrower’s credit rating. A short sale or deed-in-lieu with no delinquent mortgage payments will have the least negative impact on a borrower’s credit score. Short sales or deeds-in-lieu following a series of delinquent payments will be more harmful, and a foreclosure will have the most negative impact on a borrower’s credit report. A single late payment of 30-days could drop a credit score by 40-110 points, a 90-day delinquency may reduce a credit score by 70-135 points, and a foreclosure, short sale, or deed-in-lieu might decrease a credit score by 85–160 points. It is important for borrowers who are delinquent on their mortgage to keep current on all other obligations that are reflected in their credit report.</p>
<p>Credit reports can affect a borrower’s life in a few different situations. Employers often run credit checks on prospective employees, and could see a foreclosure and other negative events on a credit report. Landlords can also use the report to compare prospective renters.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong><em>Steps for Borrowers</em></strong></p>
<p>The first step borrowers should take if they think they are going to be delinquent or are already delinquent on their mortgage is to contact their lender to see if a modification can be achieved. If a modification cannot be achieved, the next best option is to consult the lender about a short sale. For a short sale, borrowers will probably be required to provide the lender with a letter of hardship. This letter will demonstrate to the lender why the borrower should proceed with a short sale. Relevant material to include in the letter can consist of a detailed account of the borrower’s financial difficulties, which can be illustrated by bank statements and pay stubs from employers.</p>
<p>Often lenders will consider borrowers for a short sale if the borrower has a decreased income from when the mortgage contract was established, a lack of resources in a savings account, evidence that the borrower will have difficulty making future payments, the fair market value of the real estate property has declined, and the mortgage payment is at least one month delinquent.</p>
<p>It is not recommended that borrower’s purposely delay or avoid mortgae payments in order to convince the lender that a hardship exists, or that a modification is necessary.</p>
<p><strong><em>Anti-Deficiency Laws</em></strong></p>
<p>Aside from concerns about damage to credit ratings, the most common concern facing borrowers with an underwater property is “Will the lender sue me to collect the shortfall on the loan amount?” The answer to that question can be complex and nuanced, and takes into account certain factors about the property and the type of loan.</p>
<p><strong><em>Deed of Trust</em></strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>If the debt is structured as a deed of trust, the statute that allows for a deficiency judgment is A.R.S. §33-814. According to A.R.S. §33-814, a deficiency can be received if the property is more than 2.5 acres of land and is not used for a single one-family or two-family home. However, the lender/beneficiary must file for the deficiency judgment within 90-days after the sale of the real estate property. If there is more than one trustee’s sale, the date of the last sale will be the date that begins the 90-day time period. The 90-day time period is crucial and must be complied with or the proceeds from the sale will be considered as full satisfaction of the borrower’s obligation to the lender/beneficiary. No exception will be considered if the 90-days has lapsed. As authorized in A.R.S. §33-814, the amount of a deficiency judgment shall be for the total amount owed to the beneficiary as of the date of the sale, less the fair market value of the property on the date of the sale or the sale price at the trustee&#8217;s sale, whichever is greater.</p>
<p><strong><em>Mortgage</em></strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>If the debt is structured as a mortgage, the statute that allows for a deficiency judgment is A.R.S. §33-727. Analogous to a deed of trust, a deficiency judgment can be received if the property is more than 2.5 acres of land and is not used for a single one-family or two-family home. However, A.R.S. §33-727 does not mandate a 90-day filing period against the mortgagor. But if the debt is structured as a mortgage, a deficiency judgment is not allowed if the mortgage was purchase money. Purchase money is when a mortgage is given to secure part or all of the price of the property.</p>
<p>It is important to take into account <span style="text-decoration: underline;">all</span> of the different kinds of debt secured by the property. Borrowers often times have first and second mortgages on their property, and may also have home equity lines of credit. While a lender who has given a borrower a first-lien purchase money loan may not be able to pursue the borrower for a deficiency, the same may not be true of a second-lien lender or a home equity credit line lender.</p>
<p><strong><em>Tax Considerations</em></strong></p>
<p>Another important consideration for borrowers contemplating a short sale, deed-in-lie or foreclosure is whether the borrower will have income from the cancellation of debt. Cancellation of debt income is the amount by which the canceled debt exceeds the fair market value of the property securing the debt. Cancelation of debt can occur when a lender forgives part (or all) of a debt for which the borrower was personally liable. The Mortgage Debt Forgiveness Act of 2007 was enacted to provide relief to borrowers facing cancellation of debt income as a result of a short sale, deed-in-lieu or foreclosure of certain types of property. A person seriously considering a short sale, foreclosure, or deed-in-lieu should discuss the potential tax consequences of a specific transaction with a tax attorney and/or accountant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://azcorporatelaw.com/real-estate/short-sale-foreclosure-and-anti-deficiency-information/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wells Fargo Economic Outlook &#8211; January 2012</title>
		<link>http://azcorporatelaw.com/finance/wells-fargo-economic-outlook-january-2012/</link>
		<comments>http://azcorporatelaw.com/finance/wells-fargo-economic-outlook-january-2012/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 15:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Thrasher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Finance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://azcorporatelaw.com/?p=470</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting economic overview from our friends at Wells Fargo: Wells Fargo Monthly Outlook Jan 2012.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting economic overview from our friends at Wells Fargo: <a href="http://azcorporatelaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/MEO_01112012.pdf">Wells Fargo Monthly Outlook Jan 2012</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://azcorporatelaw.com/finance/wells-fargo-economic-outlook-january-2012/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fannie/Freddie Offer Payment Extensions for Unemployed Homeowners</title>
		<link>http://azcorporatelaw.com/real-estate/fanniefreddie-offer-payment-extensions-for-unemployed-homeonwers/</link>
		<comments>http://azcorporatelaw.com/real-estate/fanniefreddie-offer-payment-extensions-for-unemployed-homeonwers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 15:00:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Thrasher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Real Estate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://azcorporatelaw.com/?p=449</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The New York Times recently reported on plans by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to extend their existing programs that allow unemployed homeowners to defer part or all of their monthly payments for up to 12 months while they are out of work. Under Fannie Mae&#8217;s plan, banks can offer unemployed borrowers up to 6 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="container">
<div id="centered">
<div id="article">
<div>
<h1><span style="font-size: 13px; font-weight: normal;"><em>The New York Times</em> recently reported on plans by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac </span><span style="font-size: 13px; font-weight: normal;">to extend their existing programs that allow unemployed homeowners to defer part or all of their monthly payments for up to 12 months while they are out of work. Under Fannie Mae&#8217;s plan, banks can offer unemployed borrowers </span><span style="font-size: 13px; font-weight: normal;">up to 6 months of reduced or skipped payments without seeking Fannie’s prior approval, and that banks could extend that forbearance up to 12 months with approval. Freddie Mac announced a similar plan to allow </span><span style="font-size: 13px; font-weight: normal;">jobless borrowers to skip or reduce payments for up to 12 months.</span></h1>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://azcorporatelaw.com/real-estate/fanniefreddie-offer-payment-extensions-for-unemployed-homeonwers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

