There can be a variety of difficulties for small, emerging companies to locate capital funds, find investors, or discover prospective acquirers. Often times, small companies will draw upon “finders” to identify possible financing resources or acquirers. A true, and legally operating, “finder” merely introduces prospective investors to companies seeking capital. The finder acts like a consultant, and earns a fixed fee or hourly fee. However, finders will typically overstep these bounds and often request that they be paid a commission based upon the amount of financing they are able to raise for the company.
If a finder takes a more active role in negotiations, investment, and advising, both federal and state securities laws require that finders register as a broker-dealer. Not only is the finder likely violating federal and state securities laws by operating as an unregistered broker-dealer, but the legal implications can be significant for the company hiring the finder. If the investment fails and investors sue, they can argue that the use of an unregistered broker-dealer voids the investment transaction. Such an argument could result in the company being liable for making investors whole on their losses. In addition, private offering exemptions can be lost by use of an unregistered broker-dealer, which could give rise to securities fraud claims.
Companies seeking to raise capital should consult with an experienced securities attorney before hiring a “finder,” or should use the services of a registered broker-dealer.
The Arizona Corporate Law Blog covers current developments and legal issues that are impacting business, finance and real estate professionals in Arizona and across the country. 